tattoo-art---artistic-expression-or-mutilation_-94251 [Documents]

Who doesn't have a tattoo or ten these days? When do tattoos become individual artistic expressions, and when do they become mutilation of the person wearing them? I can't pretend to know. I do not have any myself. I'm not against them. Rhetorical Devices In The Inaugural Address Of John F. Kennedy 've been a mainstay of human societies back to the dawn of man. It seems the modern-day surge in tattoo popularity began with professional athletes and young musicians. It was like a badge of honor, and the more you had, the more street cred you earned. But, tattoos have gone complete mainstream as we can all see. But, I wonder just how many one person needs? Of course, that's their decision and they have every right to do whatever they like with their bodies. I've seen many unbelievably creative and beautifully done tattoos. We've all seen the flip-side, too. But, what if a person changes their mind? Sure, you can have 'em lasered off, but I hear that's very expensive and painful. Does getting a tattoo lead to wanting more? Sure seems that way. Many of my friends sport them. They're extremely popular among guys and gals. Although, What Freedom Means To Me: A Few Prompts For Your Essay stamp" is very troubling. Just because a woman decides to get a large wingy tat on her back, does that suddenly make her trailer trash? Not in my book. No way. It's all about self-expression and every-body's right to do as they see fit. But, why people get 'em makes me very curious. Feminist Tyranny - A U.S. Export To The World is pretty dang hip these days, at any age, no question about it. But, then there's always the old "fading" issue. And, you won't know how your tattoos will play out over the long haul until you get there. Too many variables to predict, I'd imagine. The ones that bug me most are on the neck, and especially, THE FACE! God, why would you want to make yourself immediately unemployable and a stared-at freak? That one I don't get. But, you certainly see it more often than before. And, once again, it's not my choice to make. I have always been a Freedom of Speech fanatic. And, isn't that really what tattoos are all about? The popularity of tattoos is just off the charts. I look at how many parlors exist in our small town, and I'm blown away by the number that have sprung up recently. Well, it's all about being free to do whatever you want. It's really none of my business, but I am an admitted tattoo gawker. It's impossible not to look. I'll even ask a person about his or hers if I like it. Once it felt like the true enemy of humanity, the Capitalist class, has been identified, we feel that we are back in the grip of paralysis, as every government, in every age, has always shown itself to become unbelievable brutal and cruel in some form or another. It seems like a hopeless situation at first, because we are all well aware that the governments defend themselves with the idea that they are the guardian of the people, but in the end, the governments have always been guardians of their own interests. And this is the meeting ground of two political theories, two different understandings of the world that share common threads in the knitting of their philosophy. There is the Anarchist position, sometimes associating with thought trends in Libertarianism and Democracy, and there is the Communist position, in certain cases, parallel to Socialism and Marxism. Theoretically, the idea of a weak or non-existent government is also coupled with the idea of equally oppressive and inhumane corporations. And, again, theoretically, Communist governments create a ruling class which was just as oppressive as the Capitalist class, their sworn enemy. Those rebel forces in third world nations that fight for political autonomy, for representative or democratic government over plutocratic and oppressive monarchies, they consider themselves Nationalists, in that they are fighting for their country's independence. On the other hand, there are the Socialists who advocate peace and acceptance of all cultures. As a rule, we are all opposed to Patriotism and Nationalism of any kind, as it is a hindrance to creating solidarity with all workers to overthrow our oppressor: the Capitalist class. Some Conservatives have hailed the call of Libertarianism, as a means of limiting the power and capabilities of government, but at the same time strengthening business as though corporate executives were the philosopher-kings of Plato's Republic. Some Liberals, on the other hand, have hailed the call of Socialism as means of limiting the exploitation of the Capitalist class upon the working proletariat. While society seems content to put a sliding scale on the issue of politics, left or right, there are actually two questions: the one of wealth distribution (involving work wages, tariffs, income tax rates, sanctions on foreign sweat shop labor, etc., etc.) and the other of national and international policy (involving gun control, war, colonialism, political slavery of third world nations, etc., etc.). The theory of Anarchist Communism, Anarcho-Communism, or Libertarian Communism is based on a single premise: all authority is apt to its own corruption, and to create misery, in the form of oppression or poverty, for all who are under its power. There is the economic slavery, such as an employer setting a low wage and threatening you with starvation if you refuse. There is also the political slavery, of an enormous government working to satisfy the interests of a few top, property-owning class, whether its the government itself (Statist Communism) or to corporations (such as America right now, outsourcing labor to slave camps in Asia). This post was created by Essay Writers .