how-gps-tracking-threatens-our-privacy-71524 [Documents]

How GPS tracking threatens our privacy On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will confront the profound impact of new location-tracking technologies on Americans' privacy. The case, U.S. versus. Jones, presents the question of whether criminal needs a warrant before planting a GPS tracking device on a person's car. The response to this question is important in its own right, but the case is likely to be experiencing broader implications. Attaching a GPS to a car isn't the only way the government can track people's exercises. In How IoT Tracking Devices are changing the Fleet Management Business , everyone having a cell phone has already been carrying a device that the government can use to monitor his or her location. As a result, the principle at stake in this case may well shape our privacy rights in your lifetime and decades arrive. The police in the current case suspected Antoine Jones of drug violations and tracked his movements continuously for 1 month by installing a GPS device on his automobile. Increasingly, though, criminal arrest agents are tracking our movements by tracking the cell phones that completed are already carrying near. It no matter whether your phone can be a smartphone or whether you use it products and are calls; prolonged as you as your phone is turned on, it registers its location with cell phone networks frequently a minute, and all U.S. phone companies hold on tight to that data, a couple of them several years ago. This type of tracking is actually very invasive, as if the government knows where you are, it knows who you are. As the Jones appellate court explained in its ruling that the government violated the Fourth Amendment, "A person understands all of another's travels can deduce whether a weekly churchgoer, a huge drinker, a daily at the gym, an unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, a user of particular individuals or political groups – harmful . rrr just a great fact in terms of a person, but all such facts." Cell phone tracking can reveal our private associations and relationships with each other. The government could make note of whenever people being tracked crossed path or spent time together, showing who our friends, associates and lovers are. The Justice Department sometimes gets warrants to track location, along with many local public safety officers make it a policy, which demonstrates it's no unworkable wishe. But state and federal judges across the nation have made conflicting rulings on what standards have for federal government to obtain tracking information from mobile companies. How GPS Trackers work_ Hardware Lesson 1 provides the government with an impressive and inexpensive tool stick to individuals the way they travel through both public and private areas. Unless the court concludes that such tracking requires a warrant, anyone's movements could be subject to remote monitoring and permanent recording at the sole discretion of any curious police officer, without any judicial management. And even though may quit How GPS Fleet Tracking Recovers Stolen Vehicles to think about that brand new will install a GPS device on every car, it's not at all implausible to think that brand new will ask cell phone providers flip over location-tracking information en masse – and it might well become case that the government lands on so definitely been. It was revealed last month that the London police have a system that lets them track associated with phones instantly time in a targeted geographic area, a technology that could easily give the government for everyone in an Occupy protest, tea party rally various other political occasion. The genius of the Constitution simple fact that its limits on the government can still be applied in a modern world that the framers could scarcely have imagined. Anybody who values privacy should hope that the judge ensures the government cannot use technological advances to undermine the liberties this country was founded on.