Free speech is a massive step in human civilization. The ability to say something without fear of persecution and/or death is a big step in human society and is something that only around fifty countries have. My essay is about free speech in US colleges and how it is rapidly declining at a frightening rate. In the case of Sweezy vs. New Hampshire in 1957 the Supreme Court said, “Teachers and students must always remain free to enquire, otherwise our civilization will stagnate and die.” Many would agree with that statement and consider it true, but in modern US colleges there is a massive restriction on free speech to the point where the comment made by the Supreme Court no longer applies in some places in the US. The US colleges are literally removing free speech from our futures by stamping it out in through what they teach younger people.

In 2010, there was a study by the Association of American colleges and universities. They found that over 70% of college students found it unsafe to hold unpopular positions on campus. This means they may have had opinions and thoughts about issues, but they did not feel safe expressing their thoughts in college. Another troubling element of the 2010 is that the longer the student spends in the college, the less safe he or she feels about holding and expressing unpopular opinions. If we were to blame outside influences, then students would enter and leave college either as safe or unsafe as they like. However, it is clear that the longer a student spends in college, then the more restricted and repressed his or her freedom of speech is. [[https://foursquare.com/user/579850657/list/president-bush-knows-all-of-this-1|President Bush Knows All Of This]] feel safer using their freedom of speech, but they begin to feel less safe as they move through college.

To clarify, the feeling of safety is safety from repercussions and not from physical harm. The students feel safe from harm in college, but they do not feel safe from the penalization from professors. They feel uneasy about expressing their unpopular positions or opinions within their work and dissertations, and they do not feel as if they are free to speak their true feelings and opinions because they fear they will be marked down and/or looked upon unfavorably by the people that control their grades and ability to get their qualifications. What is more worrying is the fact that colleges and universities in the US are blatantly restricting student’s freedom of speech. [[https://pbase.com/topics/hviidlohmann40/todays_american_how_free|Today's American: How Free?]] claim they do it to help avoid people getting offended, which further proves the point that freedom of speech is less important to these colleges that the fear of people being offended. To cast freedom of speech aside for any reason, noble or not, is to shatter its very foundation and urinate in the faces of the people that died for it.

Speech codes are a common and blatant sign that students are having their freedom of speech restricted. The colleges and universities are not even hiding the fact that their speech codes are regulations that limit or bans expression. It literally says that in their regulations. The first amendment in the US constitution states implicitly that people are allowed to speak and write what they wish, and yet colleges and universities are disregarding it when they set use speech codes. Yet, what is it that colleges are protecting students from? If it were from people writing instructions on how to build a bomb, then one could argue that the protection of life is more important than freedom of speech. Yet, [[https://penzu.com/p/cd7c329b|Americans' Freedom To Choose]] of the speech codes in US colleges and universities are there to stop people writing or saying things that the college/university in question feels are offensive. They usually revolve around religion or political views. Colleges and universities in the US are banning students from speaking, writing and even holding opinions that contradict what the college likes, and that is a blatant middle finger to a US citizen’s freedom of speech.

However, since there are no provisions to keep immigrants off the dole or mandate that new immigrants complete the same naturalization process as those immigrants before them I wouldn't vote for it (besides, I am sure there are other problems with the legislation that I didn't see). Greencards are granted to only 140,000 skilled workers per year, why? Why not allow all skilled workers in? It would only serve to make out economy stronger and our foreign relations stronger. I'd mention the additional tax revenues that could be received but I seek to repeal the 16th amendment and abolish the IRS. I would also vote to increase the number of temporary visas granted to highly skilled workers. I would vote to allow some immigrants to remain in the country while pursuing legal residency. I would support legislation that would require hospitals to report illegal aliens if said hospital seeks state reimbursement for treating them. In addition, I wouldn't make it necessary for hospitals to provide care to undocumented aliens IF they can be safely sent back home country without a significant chance of their condition worsening.

This data was done by [[//essayfreelancewriters.com/|Essay Writers]] .